 |
|
|
|
|
MOVIES FRONT | MOVIE REVIEWS | INTERVIEWS | COMING SOON | BOX OFFICE PREDICTIONS & REPORT | NEWS | LINKS |
Frankie Feedback (Part 5) Presents: “A Poisoned Pen, An Opinionated Mind” 
E-MAIL FRANK OCHIENG PREVIOUS PARTS: “Nothing Like the Flow of a Good Old Moviegoer’s Angst” “The Moviegoer Strikes Back!” “Penny for your Pithy Thoughts” "Meet Frank Ochieng, Cinema Cynic" Welcome TheWorldJournal.com movie enthusiasts to the fifth installment of the Frankie Feedback column series entitled “A Poisoned Pen, An Opinionated Mind” where the mixed feedback continued to pour in from avid film fans. As in the case of the previous Frankie Feedback articles, there are featured comments by a handful of concerned moviegoers looking to share their cinematic input with yours truly. And as always, the feedback is always welcomed whether it’s good, bad or indifferent. So without further hesitation, let’s see what some of the supporters/distracters have to say about film scribe Frankie O and his take on the selected cinema that he has set his proactive pen to in diligent fashion. Now for some insightful fodder, we’ll proceed with the write-up known as Frankie Feedback Part 5: A Poisoned Pen, An Opinionated Mind. And now, the consensus about Frankie is the following: Comments to Frank about his review on WHALE RIDER: Bill Hodges from Santa Clara, CA writes: “Frank, you gotta believe. Yes, you gotta believe in miracles that the newest, best darn actress on the planet will receive at least a Best Supporting Oscar nomination sometime in January ’04. Seen Whale Rider 3 going on 4 times now. Went back mainly to watch the stunning performance by Keisha. Heard tell she got a small acting part in Star Wars Episode III as a regal queen—Queen Naboo or some other place. Meanwhile, I hope we get to see Keisha in another lead drama role in the near future, before the 13 year-old decides to pursue another career. Bill from the block—Santa Clara, CA P.S. Enjoy your writing and enthusiasm for the movies Frank’s response: “Bill, being the Whale Rider fanatic that you are, I hope you get rewarded with the satisfaction that WR might receive should it cop Academy Award recognition. Certainly, this family gem is worth the fuss and thus deserves all the kudos this film can muster up.” Comments to Frank about his review on SWIMMING POOL: Karen Mueller writes: “Read your evaluation of the Swimming Pool and I totally disagree! I thought it was a total waste of time and money. If you could quit yawning you got rewarded with the nudity of Sarah? I am not a prude-but that whole scene was stupid to me. I really hate it that this movie got good reviews by you pros. We saw 9 people walk out of the movie and not come back and all others we spoke to on the way out, indicated that they disliked the movie too!” Frank’s response: “Although I do thank you for your immediate response to my critique of SWIMMING POOL, I am acknowledging your disagreement with this movie. So you contend that this sexual character study thriller was “a total waste of time and money?” And you cite the fact that you yawned yet the movie did me a favor by providing a cheap thrill of having curvy protagonist Sarah walk around in the buff? Oh please Karen…spare me the obvious bubble gum observations. I provided an elaborate explanation as to why SWIMMING POOL was a sensual treasure to behold within its context. But you have yet to give me a solid reason why you despised this film despite your flimsy reservations about a nude scene you found quite stupid. Hmmm…okay! And you point to the fact that a few dissatisfied moviegoers left their seats in disgust. Big whoopie! I’ll easily point out to you the hoard of folks that stayed in their seats and dipped their pleasurable toes in SWIMMING POOL. Karen, this film is quite analytical and offers a sophistication of vagueness as its appeal. Granted, if you honestly thought this movie bites and uniquely had no redeeming value whatsoever then fine…that’s your feeling and you’re entitled to it. But at least offer some constructive criticism and articulate your argument beyond the “critics are misleading” angle. SWIMMING POOL is not an easy piece of cinema to digest but if you are willing to artistically challenge yourself once in a while then maybe your dismayed demeanor could have been deemed null and void.” Comments from TWJ.com movie forum that mentions Frank in reference to THE LAST SAMURAI: Anthony writes: “I saw the preview of the movie The Last Samurai starring Tom Cruise. From what I saw it could easily be a potential Oscar nominee in a couple of categories (Picture, Lead Actor). I come to TWJ movies web site a lot because I share many opinions on certain films with Frank Ochieng. I’m curious to hear everyone’s feedback on The Last Samurai.” Frank’s response: “Anthony, it’s nice to have you on board and continue to enjoy your browsing through our TWJ.com movie section as we all try to give movie addicts a fair and honest insight into how we perceive cinema thoughtfully. As for The Last Samurai, it’ll be interesting to see what this film does in reference to collecting the intrigue of moviegoers and the Academy Award voters alike.” Comments from TWJ.com movie forum that mentions Frank in reference to FINDING NEMO: Zulu from New Zealand writes: (The following is a movie quote from Frank Ochieng’s film review of FINDING NEMO): “It’s thrilling to know that spry and meticulously made family CG films are becoming more imaginative and innovative in the production value department. More importantly, Finding Nemo has an intriguing story to tell that’s every bit as heartbreaking as it is hearty. This is truly one delightful deep-sea display worth blindly diving into hastily without worrying about the rocky surface below.” Zulu then mentions: “A little from the review from twj movies. Frank Ochieng is my hero!” Frank’s response: “Glad you enjoy FINDING NEMO so much and that you concur with my assessment on this frothy family film about a fishy father-son tandem. As for designating me your “hero”, I’m flattered whether you mean it in a sincere or sarcastic sense.” (smile) Comments made to Frank about his review on JEEPERS CREEPERS 2: Kalah writes: “mmmk w/e I think you hate everything soo what the hell” Frank’s response: “No Kalah…contrary to belief I don’t hate everything—that’s an exaggeration on your part. I will admit, however, that I do dislike incomprehensible brief responses to my film reviews that aren’t as snappy and clever as the writer thinks it is. Let me give you an example, shall I? How about this: mmmk w/e I think you hate everything soo what the hell! Does this nonsensical quip ring a bell, Kalah? Comments made to Frank about his review on NATIONAL SECURITY: Grilva Delgado writes: “I was really amazed with the attitude of the character played by Martin Lawrence. It was absolutely racist to the point that the Lawrence character send an innocent cop to jail and that is supposed to be funny. His obsession about being black is showed during most of the scenes with special stress on his lack-of-brilliant conclusion to the white cop when he tells him that “being innocent in jail + your girlfriend dumped you + an underpaid job after that” means you’re a black guy. Basically the simple action plot was just an excuse to portrait was the movie is about: A different version of racism, promoted by the black not-funny main character. By the waym this is very mild review, I’ve read it worse and of course more accurate. Maybe I am not the target audience of this movie! At least it was a rental.” Frank’s response: “Hey Grilva, so you think my review of NATIONAL SECURITY is very mild and could have been more scathing, huh? What the heck did you want me to say or do—put out a hitman contract on Martin Lawrence and the handlers that were responsible for this misguided mess? What more do you want? After all, I did previously denounce this crappy comedy in ink! Besides, I can think of a lot more racist and irresponsible duds that need a tongue-lashing than what was needlessly showcased in the dimwitted likes of NATIONAL SECURITY.” Comments made to Frank about his review on TIME CHANGER: Paul M. Curran writes: “The movie TIME CHANGER is fun and has a point, we need to be respectable to others. TIME CHANGER is better than the book HOPE TO TIME TRAVEL.” Stephan Vanhaverbeke writes: “Why is it that Christians think they are the sole dictators of all moral standards? Is it wrong to steal, only because Mozes said so? And why is it that these Christian morals are always related to some fear of Doom and Devil? This flick boasts more empty meaning than Matrix 2…save money.” Bugger writes: “This is the biggest load of bollocks I have ever seen and certainly the worst film this year or in the past 10 years come to that.” Nannette Redin writes: “Does any religion have a monopoly in virtue and goodness? How sad a movie.” David G. Palmer from Aberdeenshire, Scotland writes: “I was for the first hour or so vaguely amused by this film, and initially noted with some satisfaction the early encounter between the obviously enlightened Bible professor and his clearly bigoted mentor. I was subsequently taken aback by the unexpected twist in favour of the latter. There was no latitude whatsoever for the billions of souls who will never know Jesus-either because in the modern world they are too intelligent to submit to the dogma and stupidity of archaic religions in general, or because they were unfortunate enough to have been indoctrinated from an early age into one of the other so-called ‘faiths’ which have collectively ensured so much suffering in their names throughout human history. I am British, and therefore fortunate that we are not so far dominated by the self-serving religious corruption and related stupidity that afflicts far too many other nations-regfrettably including the contemporary USA and its reigning political establishment. The essential message of this film-effectively rammed down the throats of unsuspecting cinema audiences-is virtually guaranteed to reduce further the standing and perception of the USA across the range of cultures not exactly wedded to born-again Christianity. In its way, this message is no less compromising than those emanating from Bin Laden; it amounts to either being With Us, or else facing eternal damnation. That most ridiculous concept belongs somewhere back in the Dark Ages. If you should let your children watch this film-attracted no doubt by the time-travel billing-please do warn them not to take it too seriously…Yours Very Sincerely, David (Aberdeenshire, Scotland)" Comments made to Frank about his review on THE TRANSPORTER: Nivia Santiago writes: “I liked it so much I saw it like three times in a row. The kick-ass action had me at the edge of my seat. Jason Statham is awesome I want to see more of him in movies.” Frank’s response: “Let me guess…you head up the Jason Stratham fan club for faceless, frenetic flicks…right?” Comments made to Frank about his review on ORANGE COUNTY: M Ellis writes: “Damn, Frank, alliteration can be a excellent writing tool, but you use it like a third grade poet. Anyways, Orange County is one hell of a movie and focuses on more than just teenage angst. While the comedic side of the movie is definitely well done, there are many times when, if you can hear the dialogue over your own laughter, the movie strikes a chord with those of us who’ve tried to stake out a course in life. Hey Frank, you’ll never catch the rooster, buddy!” Frank’s response: “Hey Ellis, I may never catch the rooster as you proudly proclaim but I’ll always mingle with a lame duck such as yourself so all is not lost at all. And how’s this passage for a seemingly “third grade poet” with an alliteration fetish: Fortunately, Frank flagrantly fingers fickle film fools frequently. Try uttering that phrase ten times fast, Mr. Cinematic Simpleton!” Comments made to Frank about his review on CHICAGO: Susan Lee writes: “This movie is pure entertainment!! Good direction but the lead star Renee is not sexy enough…too skinny…no boobs and cannot sing…Catherine Z Jones is beautiful & sexy…Richard Gere!! Who would have thought he has it in him to pull this off…A good movie to watch of you have nothing better to do…” Frank’s response: “Ah, okay Susan…we get your point and thanks. And I suppose it’s safe to say that you aren’t Renee Zellwegger’s agent, huh?” Comments made to Frank about his review on 2 FAST 2 FURIOUS: Carmen Delgado writes: “I love it the first and the second one I’m just simply in love with Vin Diesel and Paul Walker Oh!!! and off course Tyresse the three of them are great actors I hope that Universal Studios decide to do a third one” Frank’s response: “Somehow Carmen, I’m sure Universal Studios will match your request to have your action-packed studmuffins back for some rubber-burning excitement in another over-the-top and stylized formulaic fable that will make the young chicks gush and the guys groan with approval.” Alyssa writes: “I love the movie 2fast 2furious and the fast and the furious! I really like Paul Walker and Vin Diesel…there awesome acotrs!!!!!!!!and im really hping n wishing that they make a 3rd one!!!! Frank’s response: “Geez, I can see why TFATF franchise is profitable despite its empty-headed premise—it appeals to hormonal honey bunnies who like looking at cocky pedal-to-the-metal pretty boys flexing and acting rebellious. Guess we cannot blame the opportunistic filmmakers for catering to a certain movie crowd that will give their fleeting flick credibility and a craving of cold cash to boot!” Comments made to Frank about his review on OLD SCHOOL: Lauren Isola writes: “Will Farrell is a brilliant actor who is extremely funny! He can keep a straight face even in the madness he creates a great movie, his personality mixed with the laid bak sort of funny personality of Luke Wilson and the very bold smart ass comments of Vince Vaughan are a great mixture and it truly shows how ridiculous the yearing to be back in Collage really is for a bunch of 30 year old men! I laughed so hard during this movie and I thought it was HILARIOUS! Who ever dosent like this needs to stop being so prude and live a little, laugh…its contagious! Will Ferrell blows every other comedian out of the water! SNLs greatest performer…terrible era for them though! Yet Ferrell the shining star!” Frank’s response: “Lauren, don’t you think that using the terminology of “great” and “greatness” to describe Farrell and his Animal House rip-off/clone Old School is a tad bit too much? Granted, you are entitled to enjoy your enthusiasm and think highly of Farrell and his anointed “classic” about thirtysomething college clowns trying to recapture their academic youthfulness. But somehow, giving high regard to Old School doesn’t necessarily put this Farrell farce in the distinguished company of candidates such as the aforementioned Animal House or Rodney Dangerfield’s riotous Back to School for that matter. And yes, Will Farrell probably is one of the top ten of past/present SNL alums to ever be deemed one of that legendary show’s greatest contributors.” Click here to comment on this article. Frank Ochieng © TheWorldJournal.com |
|
|
MOVIES FRONT | MOVIE REVIEWS | INTERVIEWS | COMING SOON | BOX OFFICE PREDICTIONS & REPORT | NEWS | LINKS |
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links |
| Web Hosting Forum - Web hosting, marketing and webmaster related issues. Find the best hosting for your website! |
| Top
Box Office Movies © TheWorldJournal.com, All rights reserved. Student News Network For the best advertising rates at TheWorldJournal.com (120x600 - new banner format by the Interactive Advertising Bureau), click here. Back to top |
e-mail: info@theworldjournal.com sales: sales@theworldjournal.com |
||